Legal Opinion
City of Wichita v. Lucero
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided May 27, 1994No. 69,839PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Holmes, C.J.:
This is an appeal by the City of Wichita (City) from the district court’s ruling that the mandatory minimum fine provision for repeat offenders, as set forth in § 5.66.055(b) of the Code of the City of Wichita, is unconstitutional. This appeal is taken upon a question reserved by the City pursuant to K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 22-3602(b)(3).
The facts are not in dispute. James Lucero was arrested on December 2, 1992, for violating § 5.66.055(a)(1) of the Code of the City of Wichita. The ordinance makes it unlawful for any person to intentionally…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tate v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- State v. BerrethSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- State v. GordonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- City of Wichita v. HackettSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- State Board of Nursing v. RuebkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.