Legal Opinion

United States v. Groos

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 13, 2008No. 06 CR 420Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JOAN B. GOTTSCHALL, District Judge.

Before the court are four pretrial motions filed by defendant, Nicholas D. Groos (“Groos”): (1) a motion to dismiss insufficient indictment; (2) a motion to dismiss counts 2 and 4 for failure to state an offense; (3) a motion to strike surplusage; and (4) a motion for depositions of foreign witnesses. 1 For the reasons stated below, the court grants the motion to strike surplusage [57], denies the motion to dismiss insufficient indictment [55] and the motion to dismiss counts 2 and 4[53], and denies without prejudice the motion…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API