Legal Opinion
Flanigen v. Mullen & Gunn, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1965PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtMichael Catalano, J.
Plaintiffs move to examine, relevant to the issues herein, Roger Blackwell, Henry Gallant and Pat Abulone.
Plaintiffs sue for wrongful discharge from the employment of defendant, Mullen and Gunn, Inc. On September 10, 1964 plaintiffs served a notice to take the testimony of said defendant by Gordon H. Gunn, Robert Gunn, Pat Abulone, Donald Shu*945maker and Roger Blackwell and any other officers, agents and employees having knowledge of the issues herein.
'Commencing January 20, 1965, the testimony of Gordon H. Gunn and Robert Gunn was taken. Donald Shumaker was no longer in the employ of said…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dorsey v. Stuyvesant Town Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Angell v. BoothNew York Supreme Court · 1938
- Dorsey v. Stuyvesant Town Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Laruffa v. AstaritaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Kraushaar v. GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.