Legal Opinion

Corcoran v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 13, 1902No. Appeal, No. 17PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal, No. 17, Jan. T., 1902, by plaintiff, from judgínent C. P. Chester Co., April T., 1901, No. 23, on verdict for defendant in case of John F. Corcoran v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. Before Hemphill, P. J. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Verdict and judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appealed. Error assigned was in giving binding instructions for defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Dean,

Corcoran, the plaintiff, was a truck farmer living near Coatesville in Chester county, and in carrying on his business had occasion to-make almost daily trips from his farm into the town. The farm at one side'is bounded by the railroad company’s right of way. A lane leads from the farmhouse across the railroad tracks at grade into the town, where at the boundary of the latter, it becomes a street called Third avenue; the street has a rather steep ascent just as it approaches the railroad and attains the level of the tracks, of which there are two, about fifty feet…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Muckinhaupt v. Erie RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cathcart v. Oregon-Washington R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Oklahoma Union Ry. Co. v. HoukSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Jensen v. Oregon Short Line R.Utah Supreme Court · 1922
  4. McKahan v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  5. Baltimore & O. R. v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API