Legal Opinion

Mellman v. Golden

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 30, 1962No. 6872PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBryant, J.

This matter comes on for consideration npon the motion of Harold M. Golden and Ruth S. Golden, defendantsappellees, to dismiss the appeal of Carl B. Mellman, plaintiff-appellant, upon the ground that Mellman failed to file a bill of exceptions within the required length of time.

It appears that Mellman and the Goldens were lessor and lessees respectively of improved real estate located in Columbus, Ohio, that a disagreement arose as a result of which Mellman began the action now before this court by filing a petition in the Columbus Municipal Court to terminate the lease, to evict the Goldens,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tenesy v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Betty's Royal Tavern, Inc. v. Board of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Byrd v. IngallsOhio Court of Appeals · 1955

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Ridge v. MoonOhio Court of Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API