Legal Opinion
In re: Philips Recalled CPAP, Bi-Level PAP, and Mechanical Ventilator Products Litigation; James v. Philips, et al.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 16, 2025No. 2:22-cv-01383Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) IN RE: PHILIPS RECALLED CPAP, ) BI-LEVEL PAP, AND MECHANICAL ) VENTILATOR PRODUCTS ) Master Docket: Misc. No. 21-1230 LITIGATION ) ) ) MDL No. 3014 This Document Relates to: ) ) James v. Philips, et al., #22-1383 ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction Pending before the court is a motion (ECF No. 23), with brief in support (ECF No. 24), filed by Defendants Philips RS North America LLC, Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips North America LLC, Philips Holding USA, Inc., and Philips RS North America Holding Corporation…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- James F. Boyer and Mary R. Boyer v. Snap-On Tools Corporation, Kenneth Baldwin and Keith A. Kaiser. Appeal of James F. Boyer and Mary R. BoyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Stephen B. Batoff, ph.d. v. State Farm Insurance Company, Leonard M. Paul, ed.dCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Charles E. Abels and Irene C. Abels v. State Farm Fire & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- In Re: Karen A. Briscoe Alfred Lara Wanda T. Kizer Debra Alexander Rhonda Allen Mary Green Glenda D. Abbott and Leslie BalesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.