Schall v. Camors
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Petition to Superintend, and Revise Order of, and Appeal from, the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana ; Rufus E. Foster, Judge. In the matter of Albert Ee More and Ed. E. Carriere, bankrupts; Frederick Camors and others, trustees. On petition to revise and appeal by William Schall, Jr., and others, to review an order disallowing their claims. Petition to revise dismissed.
1Opinion of the Court
GRUBB, District Judge.
These cases were submitted together; No. 3163 being a petition to revise an order of the District Court sitting in bankruptcy, disallowing a claim against the bankrupt estate, and No. 3164 being an appeal from the same order. As appeal is the proper remedy, the petition to revise is ordered dismissed, at petitioners’ costs.
The appeal presents the question as to whether a claim in its nature a tort, arising out of a partnership transaction, may be proven against the individual estates of the partners, when the claim has been filed and allowed as a claim in contract…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miller v. New Orleans Acid & Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Reynolds v. New York Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1911
- In re CoeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
- Farmers' & Mechanics' Nat. Bank of Philadelphia v. Ridge Avenue BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
3Cited by7 opinions
- Globe Indemnity Co. of Newark v. KeebleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- In Re Hurley Mercantile Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
- Hampel v. MinkwitzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927
- Glenn v. W. C. Mitchell Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
- In re R. P. Brown & Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.