Legal Opinion
Wright v. Blank
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 1, 1927No. 5049PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.
Lauzier-Wolcott & Co., copartners, were stockbrokers with principal offices at Butte, Mont. Not being members of the New York Stock Exchange, they transacted most of their business through A. A. Houseman & Co., a member of the Exchange. As found by the referee, they operated in a manner very similar to that explained at length in the opinion of the court in the case of Skiff v. Stoddard, 63 Conn. 216, 26 A. 874, 28 A. 104, 21 L. R. A. 102. On June 4, 1925, they posted a notice on their door that they were unable to meet their obligations, and thereafter they did not ,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thomas v. TaggartSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Duel v. HollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Furber v. DaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Skiff v. StoddardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- Harris v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Adair v. Reorganization Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Leonard v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1929
- Sexton v. American Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- In Re KardosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- In re CawleyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.