Legal Opinion
Tidler v. Eli Lilly & Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 1, 1982No. Civ. A. No. 80-2795PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ARTHUR L. BURNETT, Magistrate.
On February 9, 1982 the plaintiffs1 filed a motion to compel discovery of all defendants with reference to a number of questions in Plaintiffs’ Second Set of Interrogatories regarding market share and distribution. Specifically, plaintiffs seek to compel defendants to furnish information about the specific share of the diethylstilbestrol (hereinafter DES) market they each had during the relevant period involved in this lawsuit.2 All five (5) of the remaining defendants have filed oppositions, citing points and authorities in support thereof,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Bichler v. Eli Lilly & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Semler v. Psychiatric Institute of Washington, D. C., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Burnside v. Abbott LaboratoriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Martin v. Abbott LaboratoriesWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Celotex Corp. v. CopelandSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Mullen v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- Sheffield v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.