State v. Unosawa

(concurring in part, dissenting in part)- — -I concur in that part of the majority opinion which affirms the conviction on count No. 1, and dissent from that part thereof which reverses the conviction of manslaughter on count No. 2.

The real difference of opinion between the majority and myself hinges upon the meaning to be given the italicized words in count No. 2 of the information:

“Count (2) . . . further do accuse James M. Un-osawa of the crime of Manslaughter, committed as follows:

“He, the said James M. Unosawa, as a part of the transaction alleged in Count I and connected therewith, in…