Legal Opinion

Gallagher v. Furman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 1, 1943No. Appeal, 12Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

Action of trespass for personal injuries received by plaintiff as a result of a fall in defendants’ building. Verdict for plaintiff. Judgment non obstante veredicto entered for defendants. Plaintiff appeals.

The facts viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff are as follows:

Defendants are the owner® of a building located on the south side of West Market 'Street, Scranton, Pa., numbered 113. They use the first floor of the building, except the space required for a passage and stairway to the second floor, as a store. At the east end of the building is the entrance…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Max Azen, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Haddon v. SnellenburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Burckhalter v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Wessner v. Blue Ridge Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Mammana v. Easton National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API