Legal Opinion · Dissent

People ex rel. West v. Herrendorf

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 17, 1989No. 1—87—3808Published

1DissentJustice McMORROW

I respectfully dissent because the record indicates that the trial court failed to apply the proper standards in ruling on defendant’s motion for sanctions under section 2 — 611. The motion alleged, and the record discloses, several untruthful, incomplete and misleading statements of fact and law made by plaintiff and her attorney and the possible existence of an improper motivation for pursuing, for nearly two years, this paternity action against defendant as the only alleged father. Thus, I believe that it was incumbent upon the trial court to apply the proper standards in determining the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rivera v. MinnichSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. In Re MitanIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Gluth Brothers Construction, Inc. v. Union National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Prevendar v. ThonnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API