Cracraft v. City of St. Louis Park
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1DissentScott, Justice
I agree with the dissent of Mr. Justice Kelly. In addition, I believe that today’s holding is inconsistent with the decision reached in the recent case of Kossak v. Stalling, 277 N.W.2d 30 (Minn.1979). In Kossak, we declared unconstitutional the commencement of suit requirement contained in Minn.St. 466.05 and in so doing took a significant stride forward in striking down such artificial barriers which serve no purpose other than to foster the abolished doctrine of sovereign immunity. In sharp contrast, the majority holding in this case constitutes a step backward in that it perpetuates…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Connolly v. Nicollet HotelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Kossak v. StallingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Hanson v. ChristensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Austin v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.