Legal Opinion

Steve Casias v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 28, 1963No. 6915PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge,

with whom PICKETT and LEWIS, Circuit Judges, concur.

Appellant-defendant Casias was charged in a one-count indictment with the receipt, concealment, and sale of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 174, convicted by a jury, and sentenced to 14 years imprisonment. He claims that he was deprived of his Sixth Amendment right to trial by an impartial jury because prior service by members of the jury panel on similar cases, in which the prosecution witnesses in his case appeared and testified, raised a presumption of law that the entire panel was partial and prejudiced.

Prio…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Per curiam.

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Betts v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Frank v. MangumSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. United States v. William RaglandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  2. United States v. Zettie HaynesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  3. Robert Lee Willie v. Ross Maggio, Jr., Warden, Louisiana State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. Anthony D. Barber, United States of America v. David L. Hodge, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  5. Boyd v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1974

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API