Kezer v. Dwelle-Kaiser Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtSears, J.
In the form in which this case was finally submitted to the jury, the claim of the plaintiff to recover was based solely upon the theory of three separate and distinct malicious prosecutions instituted by the defendants. All rights to a recovery based on false arrest were expressly waived.
The defendant corporation carries on the business of selling glass and paints and similar articles in the city of Buffalo and vicinity. The defendants Dwelle, Kaiser and Lownie are respectively president, secretary and treasurer of the defendant corporation. The individual defendants acted together on behalf…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Burt v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Fagnan v. . KnoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Perlman v. ShanckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- Rawson v. Francis H. LeggettNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Hayden v. . New York Railways Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
3Cited by12 opinions
- Munoz v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- McClinton v. RiceArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Laffin v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Harry Warren and Stephen Nanna v. Edward Byrne and John GuldiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Jiménez v. SánchezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.