Legal Opinion

Potts v. Mayforth

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided August 9, 2001PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · FranksFranks, J.

in which SUSANO, and SWINEY, JJ., joined.

The Trial Court entered a Default Judgment against Potts pursuant to Tenn. R. Civ. P. 37.02 and then summary judgment for plaintiffs. On appeal by defendants, we affirm the Judgment of the Trial Court.

The appellants, Mary Potts Mayforth and Gordon R. Potts, Jr., have raised myriad issues on appeal, most of which are without merit on their face or were not raised below. We conclude the following issues are properly before this Court:

1. Did the Trial Court err in denying and dismissing Defendants Potts’ and Mayforth’s Motion for Sanctions?

2. Did…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shahrdar v. Global Housing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  2. Pass v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Weinstein v. HeimbergCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
  4. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992

4Cited by20 opinions

  1. Clark Construction Group, Inc. v. City of MemphisDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2005
  2. AMANNS v. GrissomCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2010
  3. Murray v. Christian Methodist Episcopal ChurchCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
  4. American Express Centurion Bank v. John LowreyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013
  5. Billy Walls dba B.S. Walls Construction v. Jeffrey S. ConnerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API