Legal Opinion

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. DeMars

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1983No. D.D. No. 83-4PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent does not remonstrate against the board’s findings that he has violated several Disciplinary Rules; rather, he protests the severity of the sanction, i.e., indefinite suspension from the practice of law, which the board recommended. Respondent urges the court to defer imposition of the suspension for two years upon the following conditions: that he refrain from practicing law for another year, permit the local bar association to monitor his work upon resumption of his practice, make any restitution ordered by the court, abstain from any consumption of alcohol and continue his active…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re LanahanArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. RoestOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In Re WootenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matter of ClyneSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  2. Bar Ass'n of Greater Cleveland v. WilsmanOhio Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API