Webster v. Denman

Counsel for plaintiff in error has furnished the court with a brief setting.forth his reasons for claiming that the petition does state a cause of action. The defendant in error was not represented upon the hearing of the case 'in this court.

We have considered the authorities which have been submitted to us and in addition have made some additional investigation of the question presented.

It will be noted that the petition does not claim any contractual relations as between plaintiff, and the defendant for the ■renting of the rooms in question. The plaintiff in error’s cause of action is based…