Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Hines

Tuscarawas County Court of Common Pleas

Decided June 27, 1946No. 27628PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By LAMNECK, J.

This is an action in which the plaintiff seeks to recover the sum of $242.00 from the defendant for the care and maintenance of Alma Hines, the mother of the defendant. The plaintiff is a son-in-law of the said Alma Hines and support-: ed her for 114 days between September 9, 1945 and January 21, 1946.

The parties waived a trial by jury and the issue was sub- ' mitted to the court without the intervention of a jury.

It appears from the evidence that sometime in 1939 the defendant and the said Alma Hines entered into a written contract, which is not now in existence but…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Town of Milton v. StorySupreme Court of Vermont · 1839
  2. Webster v. DenmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. St. Clare Center, Inc. v. MuellerOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Slapin v. SlapinDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API