Legal Opinion

United States v. Anderson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 24, 2006No. CRIM. 05-0066 PLFPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion for a bill of particulars. The issue was briefed and argued before the Court on June 16, 2006. Because the government raised an issue at argument for the first time that had not been addressed in the briefs, the Court asked the parties for supplemental briefs which have now been filed. On consideration of the arguments of the parties, the Court grants defendant’s motion in part and denies it in part.

I. BACKGROUND

Defendant’s motion for a bill of particulars initially was quite expansive, but…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. ButlerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. TrieDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
  3. United States v. RamirezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
  4. United States v. HsiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
  5. United States v. EspyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. BazezewDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  2. United States v. TajideenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. HillmerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
  4. United States v. TajideenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  5. United States v. ZewdieDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API