Legal Opinion

United States v. Ramirez

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 17, 1999No. CR 99-0043(PLF)PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This matter came before the Court for a hearing on approximately twenty motions filed by four of the seven defendants originally charged in this case. Prior to the hearing on the motions, defendants Roger Ramirez and Jose Ismael Medina-Torres entered guilty pleas, and the motions they had filed therefore became moot and were not argued. Defendant Pedro Agramonte, who had been a fugitive since the filing of the indictment, was only recently brought to the District of Columbia and arraigned. The Court therefore has given his attorney additional time to…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. United States v. ShabaniSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. United States v. SafavianCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Maurice VaughnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. Mosquera-MurilloDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  4. United States v. BrodieDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  5. United States v. PalfreyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API