G.C. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth Services
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The superior court terminated Gary Carson's 1 parental rights. Gary challenges the court's factual findings as erroneous and unable to support its termination decision. Because we believe the evidence supports the superior court's finding of abandonment, its decision that reasonable efforts were made to reunify Gary and his son Daniel, and its conclusion that termination would be in Daniel's best interests, we affirm the superior court's decision.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
A. Facts
Cousins Gary Carson and Jana Bishop grew up in a small town in Colorado.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- A.A. v. State, Department of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Brandon v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- E.J.S. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- D. M. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- T.F. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Jon S. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Christina J. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Dashiell v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Frank E. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Jeff AC, Jr. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.