Legal Opinion
Montgomery v. United States
District Court, S.D. California
Decided February 22, 2011No. 3:09-cr-01588PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER: (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (2) DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO FILE RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (3) VACATING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
JANIS L. SAMMARTINO, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 16.) Also before the Court are Plaintiffs opposition and Defendant’s reply. (Doc. Nos. 22 (Opp’n), 24 (Reply).) Having reviewed the parties’ arguments and the law, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion.
BACKGROUND
This Federal Tort Claims Act action arises out of a slip and fall accident that occurred while Plaintiff was…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Freeman v. ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Privette v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hodges v. Hertz Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2018