Legal Opinion
Federal Trade Commission v. Sterling Drug, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 8, 1963PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAWSON, District Judge.
This is a motion by the Federal Trade Commission, brought on by an order to show cause, for a preliminary injunction to restrain the defendants from disseminating or causing to be disseminated any advertisement which refers to a comparative study of five analgesic products reported in the December 29, 1962 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association, if such advertisement represents, directly or by implication:(a) That the findings or conclusions of the clinical investigators conducting the said study have been endorsed or approved by the United States…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Charles of the Ritz Distributors Corp. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Hall Signal Co. v. General Ry. Signal Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
- P. Lorillard Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
- Federal Trade Commission v. Rhodes Pharmacal Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
3Cited by5 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sterling Drug, Inc., Dancer-Fitzgerald-Sample, Inc., and Thompson-Koch CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- United States Postal Service v. Robert Beamish, D/B/A Natural ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Federal Maritime Commission v. Atlantic & Gulf/Panama Canal ZoneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sterling Drug, Inc., Dancer-Fitzgerald-Sample, Inc., and Thompson-Koch CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- W. & J. Sloane, Inc. v. Kaplan Furniture Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964