Legal Opinion

W. & J. Sloane, Inc. v. Kaplan Furniture Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 24, 1964Published

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, District Judge.

Plaintiff seeks to enjoin defendants from marketing and displaying furniture manufactured by Kaplan under the name “Beacon Hill Collection.” Plaintiff claims the exclusive right to sell this concededly outstanding quality furniture by virtue of a 1959 oral agreement with defendant Kaplan, by the terms of which, it is asserted, plaintiff was given exclusive rights in plaintiff’s “trade areas”— specifically, New York, Washington, D. C. and San Francisco.

The gravamen of plaintiff’s action is the granting by Kaplan, of the exclusive use to plaintiff of the name “Beacon…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hamilton Watch Co. v. Benrus Watch Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Sterling Drug, Inc., Dancer-Fitzgerald-Sample, Inc., and Thompson-Koch CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  3. Ehrenworth v. . Stuhmer Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. E. F. Prichard Co. v. Consumers Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  5. Huber Baking Company v. Stroehmann Brothers Company and Quality Bakers of America Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API