Legal Opinion

Williams v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 1, 1923No. 4052PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs in error (herein called defendants) were convicted under an indictment against them and others which, omitting formal parts, charged as follows:

“That heretofore, to wit, on or about the 1st day of September, 1922, at Houston, Tex., one J. E. Williams, one Charles Poe, one C. C. Hanley, one John F. Doak, one John B. Yoeham, one H. H. Dietz, one J. M. Morgan, one James L. Doak, and one Val Callaway entered into a conspiracy in restraint of trade and commerce among the several states in violation of section 1, chapter 647 of the Act of Congress of July 2,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Louis Joseph Abbate, Michael Louis Falcone, Charles G. Perry and James Shelby v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  2. United States v. Safeway Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1943
  3. United States v. Schine Chain Theatres, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API