Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Imhoff
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Memorandum.— Error from Washington district court; F. W. Sturgbs, judge. Action by Frederick Imhoff against The Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company to recover damages for loss by fire. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings the case to this court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Clark, J. ;
On April 7, 1891, Frederick Imhoff brought this action against the plaintiff in error in *766the district court of Washington county, and alleged in his petition that on March 6, 1889, he sustained a loss by fire of more than'$6,000, through the negligence of the defendant in operating its railroad along, through and adjoining his farm in said county; that the defendant disputed the amount of his claim and its liability therefor;
“that on March 11, 1889, this plaintiff and the defendant, acting by and through its agent, one C. N. Fogg, did enter…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coon v. . KnapNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Egleston v. KnickerbackerNew York Supreme Court · 1849
- Gulliher v. C., R. I. & P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1882
- Reed v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- Walbourn v. HingstenNew York Supreme Court · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Milich v. Armour Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1899
- Wimmer v. FilizolaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951