Redd v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIS, Judge.
On appeal from her convictions of possession of a firearm by a previously convicted felon, in violation of Code § 18.2-308.2, and of grand larceny, in violation of Code § 18.2-95, Monique Demetrius Redd contends that the evidence is insufficient to support her convictions. We affirm the firearm conviction and reverse the grand larceny conviction.
I. Firearm Charge
“On appeal, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom.” Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va.App. 438, 443, 358 S.E.2d 415, 418…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Martin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
- Jones v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
- Jones v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
3Cited by17 opinions
- Santraun Deshaud Speller v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2018
- Armstrong v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2001
- Prince Adjei v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2014
- Taylor v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
- Williams v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.