Kohus v. Ohio State Highway Patrol
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY: (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR FURTHER DISCOVERY PURSUANT TO RULE 56(d); (2) ORDERING THAT DEFENDANTS PROVIDE DOCUMENTS BATES STAMPED 1-2218 TO PLAINTIFF FORTHWITH; AND (3) ORDERING THAT TROOPER POH-LABEL’S DEPOSITION BE TAKEN WITHIN THIRTY DAYS FROM THE ENTRY OF THIS ORDER AND THAT DEFENDANTS MAKE HIM AVAILABLE
Michael J. Newman, United States Magistrate Judge
This civil case is before the Court on Plaintiffs motion for further discovery pursuant to *550Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d).1 See docs. 118, 121. Defendants the Ohio State Highway Patrol, Ohio…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Chris R. Plott v. General Motors Corporation, Packard Electric DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Dayton Bar Association v. ScacciaOhio Supreme Court · 2014