Legal Opinion

Kohus v. Ohio State Highway Patrol

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided September 10, 2015No. Case No. 3:12-cv-324Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ENTRY: (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR FURTHER DISCOVERY PURSUANT TO RULE 56(d); (2) ORDERING THAT DEFENDANTS PROVIDE DOCUMENTS BATES STAMPED 1-2218 TO PLAINTIFF FORTHWITH; AND (3) ORDERING THAT TROOPER POH-LABEL’S DEPOSITION BE TAKEN WITHIN THIRTY DAYS FROM THE ENTRY OF THIS ORDER AND THAT DEFENDANTS MAKE HIM AVAILABLE

Michael J. Newman, United States Magistrate Judge

This civil case is before the Court on Plaintiffs motion for further discovery pursuant to *550Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d).1 See docs. 118, 121. Defendants the Ohio State Highway Patrol, Ohio…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chris R. Plott v. General Motors Corporation, Packard Electric DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  2. Dayton Bar Association v. ScacciaOhio Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API