Legal Opinion

State v. Strandquist

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 12, 1982No. MC81-375, CA A22989PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

The state appeals a district court order sustaining defendant’s demurrer to a complaint charging him with resisting arrest. ORS 162.315. 1

Defendant demurred on the grounds that the complaint (1) is not definite and certain and (2) fails to state the acts constituting the offense in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended. Defendant contends that ORS 162.315(2) defines “resist” in alternative forms, i.e., (1) the threat of physical force, (2) the use of physical force, (3) the threat of violence, (4) the act of violence, or (5) any other means that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. SandersOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. ShadleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  3. State v. TracyOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. HuennekensOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. State v. CochranCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. State v. CochranCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API