Legal Opinion

Hess v. Riegel

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County

Decided February 5, 1923Published

1Opinion of the Court

McKeen, J.,

— This action was brought under the provisions of the Act of June 10, 1893, P. L. 415, entitled “An act to provide for the quieting of titles to land.” Upon the hearing of the rule sur petition of defendant on plaintiff to appear and show cause, etc., the following issue was framed: “Is Martin J. Riegel the owner in fee simple of the title to the premT ises situated on the south side of Bushkill Street, in the City of Easton, County of Northampton and State of Pennsylvania, containing fifty (50) feet on said south side of said Bushkill Street and being sixty (60) feet in depth, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Henry v. ZurfliehSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  2. Case of Hartman's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1833
  3. Tasin v. BastressSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Lynch's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  5. Miles v. WaggonerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API