Legal Opinion

State v. Brand

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 20, 1992No. 29310-9-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtForrest, J.

The State appeals a superior court order vacating Brand's conviction and granting Brand a new trial, claiming (1) the motion was not timely filed, (2) the motion violates prohibitions on multiple petitions, (3) the court abused its discretion in granting the motion, and (4) the court lacked jurisdiction to hear the motion. We reverse and remand.

Brand was charged February 27, 1985, with first degree premeditated murder of his wife on February 21 or 22, 1985. Prior to trial Brand underwent extensive medical, psychiatric and psychological evaluations. The trial date was continued at least twice…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re the Personal Restraint of HavertyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. In Re the Personal Restraint of TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. StandiferWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  5. In Re the Marriage of YearoutCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BrandWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In Re Personal Restraint Petition of BeckerWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  4. State v. DennisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  5. In Re BeckerWashington Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API