Legal Opinion

Moon v. Rush

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 22, 2014No. 2:11-CV-03102-GEB-CKDPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR., Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Moon and Defendants Rush, Habib, and McKen-na (collectively the “Defendants”) each move for summary judgment on claims one through five in Plaintiffs Complaint (“Compl.”). Defendants also seek summary judgment on the six remaining claims in the Complaint. Counter-Claimant Rush seeks summary judgment on all three claims in his Second Amended Counterclaim (“Countercl.”).

I. LEGAL STANDARD

A party seeking summary judgment bears the initial burden of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Simmons v. Navajo County, Ariz.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Kwan v. The Andalex Group LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barling v. UEBT Retiree Health PlanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
  2. Admor HVAC Products, Inc. v. LessaryDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2019
  3. Lisa C. Gibson v. Rocky Mountain UFCW Unions & Employers Retail and Meat Pension PlanDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2026
  4. METROPOLITAN SURGICAL INSTITUTE LLC v. CIGNADistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
  5. Norris v. MazzolaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API