Legal Opinion
Home Gas Co. v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 6, 1930No. 19354PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REID, C.
The plaintiff got a judgment •against the defendant in the sum of $2,000 •alleged to have been due as a promised contribution by defendant! of what is known to the business as “dry hole money” in drilling •a well for oil and gas by the plaintiff.
The defendant appealed, and the errors •■assigned will be discussed after we have ■stated the material evidence.
The plaintiff based its action upon a contract alleged to have been made by correspondence between the parties, and more particularly a letter written May 20, 1922, from defendant to plaintiff.
In order to more fully understand the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Turner v. McCormickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
- Nelson v. HamlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Lawrence v. RosenbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Wichita Falls & N. W. R. Co. v. Overstreet & DockterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Foster v. West Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Price v. Oklahoma College of Osteopathic Medicine & SurgeryCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
- Price v. OKL. COL. OF OSTEOPATHIC MED. & SURGERYCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
- Braun v. Camas Prairie R.Idaho Supreme Court · 1951