Legal Opinion

Arthur C. Harvey Co. v. Malley

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided October 11, 1932No. 2667PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff in this ease filed a petition for a rehearing, which has been denied. It now asks to be heard orally on the question of the proper method of computing taxes under sections 205 and 226 of the Revenue Act 1918 (40 Stat. 1061, 1075), in order that this court may correct what plaintiff’s counsel conceives to be an error on the part of the court in interpreting these two sections.

Rule 29 requires that petitions for rehearing shall be filed within fifteen days after judgment. Plaintiff’s motion is in effect a petition for rehearing in another guise. To establish…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. American Hide & Leather Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Childers v. ChildersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. United States Ex Rel. DeaversCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
  3. Rosenstadt & Waller, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
  4. Greylock Mills v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933
  5. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. United States Ex Rel. DeaversCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API