Legal Opinion

National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Valero Energy Corp.

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided August 25, 2004No. 13-04-205-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice GARZA.

Appellants have filed an interlocutory appeal under civil practice and remedies code section 15.003(c), arguing that the trial court erred by allowing the joinder and intervention of appellees in a lawsuit brought against appellants by Valero Energy Company in Hidalgo County. Specifically, appellants claim that appellees did not establish two of the four statutory elements required for joinder and intervention: (1) an “essential need” to try their claims in Hidalgo County and (2) that Hidalgo County is a “fair and convenient” venue. We conclude that appellees…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Amstadt v. United States Brass Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Bonniwell v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Eagle Properties, Ltd. v. ScharbauerTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Surgitek, Bristol-Myers Corp. v. AbelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Blalock Prescription Center, Inc. v. Lopez-Guerra, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sustainable Texas Oyster Resource Management L.L.C. v. Hannah Reef, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. Devon Energy Corporation, Devon Energy Production Company, L.P., and Devon Gas Services, L.P. v. Iona Energy, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API