United States v. Cepeda-Rios
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Rogelio Cepeda-Rios (“Cepeda-Rios”) appeals the district court’s imposition of an eight-level sentence enhancement for his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry into the United States. He argues that his prior conviction for possession of a controlled substance does not qualify as an “aggravated felony” under the sentencing guidelines. We affirm.
I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Cepeda-Rios pleaded guilty to illegal reentry into the United States after removal, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. The presentence report (“PSR”) recommended an eight-level upward adjustment based on Cepeda-Rios’s prior…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lopez v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- James H. McLellan v. Mississippi Power & Light Company, International Brotherhood of Electricalworkers, Local 605 Electrical WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Billy Kirk Pruitt v. Levi Strauss & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Floors Unlimited, Inc., D/B/A First Floors v. Fieldcrest Cannon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Sanchez-VillalobosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Alsol v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Carachuri-Rosendo v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Louisaire v. MullerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Rashid v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Mares-CalderonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.