Legal Opinion

Falciani v. United States

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 7, 1949No. 221 of 1947, AdmiraltyPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McGRANERY, District Judge.

This is an action by a seaman, under the Suits in Admiralty Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 741 et seq., to recover for injuries sustained by him while he was a member of the crew of respondent’s vessel. Two years after filing its answer, respondent moves to dismiss the libel on the ground of improper venue. Inasmuch as the ground assigned does not relate to jurisdiction, Hoiness v. United States, 335 U.S. 297, 69 S.Ct 70, the respondent concedes that his motion to dismiss must be treated as a motion to transfer. 28 U.S.C.A., § 1406.

The first issue presented by the motion is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hoiness v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Untersinger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  3. Walsh v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Silk v. United States War Shipping AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Podgorski v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martin v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API