Legal Opinion
Untersinger v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 1, 1949No. 17, Docket 20989PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
This is a libel in personam to recover damages, as well as maintenance and cure, resulting from injuries alleged to have been sustained by the libellant while employed as a messman on the S. S. Bull Run, a merchant vessel owned by the United States and operated for its account. At a pre-trial hearing the respondent moved for dismissal of the libel on the ground that the court lacked jurisdiction because the suit was not brought in the proper district. The motion was granted pursuant to an opinion. From the resulting decree of dismissal the libellant has appealed. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Brady v. Roosevelt Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- EJ DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. VanceSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
- Hoiness v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Cactus Pipe & Supply Co. v. M/V MontmartreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Untersinger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Rodinciuc v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Mercado v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Orr v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.