Legal Opinion

Burleson v. . Snipes

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 17, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

It has been uniformly held by this court that the right of removal of a cause from a state court to the United States Court on the ground of separable controversy must be determined by the facts set forth in the complaint. Timber Co. v. Ins. Co., 190 N. C., 801; Hughes v. R. R., 210 N. C., 730; Rucker v. Snider Bros., 210 N. C., 777. In the instant case the complaint alleges a cause of action against the resident defendant Snipes and the petitioner for damages for failure to surrender an automobile title certificate. The plaintiff alleges that this certificate had been attached to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crisp v. Champion Fibre Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Ivy River Land & Timber Co. v. American InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Brown v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Rucker v. . Snider Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Hughes v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lackey v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. Smith v. McDowell Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API