Legal Opinion

Harvey v. Bowles

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 29, 1900PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Complaint. Before Judge Willis. City court of Columbus.. July term, 1900.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, P. J.

The first grant of a new trial, though predicated exclusively on special legal grounds, will not be disturbed by this court, unless it affirmatively appears that the verdict complained of was absolutely demanded. Weinkle v. Railroad Co., 107 Ga. 367; Watson v. Equitable Mortgage Co., 112 Ga. 253.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Weinkle & Sons v. Brunswick & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Watson v. Equitable Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cox v. GradySupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Carr v. CarrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  3. Harvey v. BowlesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Rowe Bros. Motor Express Co. v. Twiggs CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  5. Brooks v. JackinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API