Carr v. Carr
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
1. “This being the first grant of a new trial, and the verdict not having been demanded absolutely by the evidence, this court, without undertaking to make any adjudication with respect to the reason assigned by the trial judge as the basis of his action, will affirm the judgment. Civil Code, § 5585; Cox v. Grady, 132 Ga. 368 (64 S. E. 262); McCain v. College Park, 112 Ga. 701 (37 S. E. 971); Brantley Co. v. Bank of Waycross, Id. 532 (37 S. E. 737); Harvey v. Bowles, Id. 363 (37 S. E. 363); Weinkle v. Brunswick R. Co., 107 Ga. 367 (33 S. E. 471); Macon Street R. Co. v. Jones, 116 Ga. 351 (42…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Weinkle & Sons v. Brunswick & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Cox v. GradySupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Cowart v. StricklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
- Van Giesen v. Queen InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Rowe Bros. Motor Express Co. v. Twiggs CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Lee v. LovelandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Brooks v. JackinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- Murray v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- National Union Fire Insurance v. OzburnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.