Legal Opinion
Arjun Dhakal v. Jefferson Sessions III
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 13, 2018No. 17-3377PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ripple, Circuit Judge.
Arjun Dhakal, a native and citizen of Nepal, brought this action against the Attorney General and other executive branch defendants under the Administrative Procedures Act ("APA"), 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. , and the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 - 2202. He asked the district court to review the decision of the Director of the Chicago Asylum Office, denying his application for asylum. The *534 defendants moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. They contended that Mr. Dhakal had not exhausted his administrative remedies and that the agency action is not final…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Gonzalez v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Canal A Media Holding LLC v. United States Citizenship and Immigration ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- Grace v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
- East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Jose Cruz Pleitez v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.