Legal Opinion

Omlansky v. Supermarkets

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided July 31, 2019No. C085294Published

1Opinion of the CourtButz, Acting P. J.

*524Relator Matthew Omlansky (plaintiff), by virtue of knowledge gleaned as a state employee involved with the Medi-Cal program, brought this qui tam action in the name of the State of California alleging that defendant Save Mart Supermarkets (Save Mart) had violated the False Claims Act ( Gov. Code, § 12650 et seq. ) in its billings to Medi-Cal for prescription and nonprescription medications, charging a higher price than cash customers paid in violation of 2009 statutory provisions capping Medi-Cal charges at a provider's usual and customary price (hereafter statutory cap). As the trial court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Douglas v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. County of Santa Clara v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Searcy v. Hemet Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Tirapelle v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Gaglione v. CoolidgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API