Legal Opinion

Edwards Aquifer Authority v. Chemical Lime, Ltd.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 2009No. 06-0911Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

════════════

No. 06-0911

════════════

Edwards Aquifer Authority et al., Petitioners,

v.

Chemical Lime, Ltd., Respondent

════════════════════════════════════════════════════

On Petition for Review from the

Court of Appeals for the Third District of Texas

════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Argued April 1, 2008

2ConcurrenceJustice Willett

I agree with the Court that under Barshop[1] the Edwards Aquifer Authority became effective on the date of our opinion in that case. The issue as briefed to us, however, and as addressed at length by the court of appeals,…

3Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Celotex Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Texas Workers' Compensation Commission v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Barshop v. Medina County Underground Water Conservation DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Bush v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API