Legal Opinion
Hejazi v. Saydack Law LLC
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 15, 2021No. A175301PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
614 Submitted August 6, affirmed September 15, 2021 HAMID MICHAEL HEJAZI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAYDACK LAW LLC and Jessica Saydack, Defendants. Lane County Circuit Court 20AD0013; A175301
495 P3d 751
Amit K. Kapoor, Judge. Hamid Michael Hejazi filed the brief pro se. Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and James, Judge, and Kamins, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. Cite as
314 Or App 614
(2021) 615 PER CURIAM As allowed under ORS 19.205(2), and explained in Stanwood v. Multnomah County, 135 Or App 58, 60,
898 P2d 196
(1995), plaintiff appeals an order denying his request for a waiver or deferral of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stanwood v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Smith v. Dept. of Corrections (A170818)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. C. M. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. C. M. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021