Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Patterson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 9, 1979No. 76-5088, CA 11611, SC 26206PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

The Supreme Court has remanded this case to us in a memorandum opinion, stating:

"The opinion of the Court of Appeals, 39 Or App 423, 592 P2d 576 (1979) states (at 429, n. 2):

" 'In the "Summary of Argument” section of his brief, father [petitioner here] complains about the trial court’s award of costs and attorney fees to mother. He does not, however, make any assignment of error on those issues. We therefore conclude those issues are not properly before us.’

"In so holding, the Court of Appeals apparently overlooked Rule 7.20 of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Rules of Procedure, which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of PattersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  2. In re the Marriage of PattersonOregon Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of TomosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. In re the Marriage of QuenzerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. Tidewater Contractors, Inc. v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. In re the Marriage of HeadingtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. State ex rel. Crosier v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API