Legal Opinion
In re the Marriage of Patterson
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 12, 1979No. TC 76-5088, CA 11611, SC 26206PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*633MEMORANDUM OPINION.
The opinion of the Court of Appeals, 39 Or App 423, 592 P2d 576 (1979) states (at 429, n. 2):
"In the 'Summary of Argument’ section of his brief, father [petitioner here] complains about the trial court’s award of costs and attorney fees to mother. He does not, however, make any assignment of error on those issues. We therefore conclude those issues are not properly before us.”
In so holding, the Court of Appeals apparently overlooked Rule 7.20 of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Rules of Procedure, which states that "[assignments of error are not required in equity…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re the Marriage of PattersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Marriage of TomosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- In re the Marriage of PattersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- In re the Marriage of QuenzerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- National Farmers' Union Insurance v. ScofieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Langley v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.