Legal Opinion

Meador v. Arnold

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided February 25, 1936PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Richardson

Affirming.

This is an action to recover damages for malpractice. The propriety of the court directing a verdict for the defendant is the perplexing question to be considered.

To review the action of the court, and consider and. determine the correctness of his ruling, require a review of the pleadings and evidence. The petition, after setting out Dr. Arnold’s employment to perform a hip operation for which no recovery herein .was sought, and of which no criticism is now made, charges that within a few days after the operation, Anna Meador suffered intense…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ault v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Loudon v. ScottMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Miller v. TolesMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Stacy v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  5. Casenburg v. LewisTennessee Supreme Court · 1931

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1963
  2. Smith v. BeardWyoming Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Jewish Hospital Ass'n of Louisville, Ky. v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
  4. Merker v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  5. Williams v. TartarCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API