Meador v. Arnold
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Richardson
Affirming.
This is an action to recover damages for malpractice. The propriety of the court directing a verdict for the defendant is the perplexing question to be considered.
To review the action of the court, and consider and. determine the correctness of his ruling, require a review of the pleadings and evidence. The petition, after setting out Dr. Arnold’s employment to perform a hip operation for which no recovery herein .was sought, and of which no criticism is now made, charges that within a few days after the operation, Anna Meador suffered intense…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ault v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Loudon v. ScottMontana Supreme Court · 1920
- Miller v. TolesMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Stacy v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Casenburg v. LewisTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Johnson v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1963
- Smith v. BeardWyoming Supreme Court · 1941
- Jewish Hospital Ass'n of Louisville, Ky. v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
- Merker v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
- Williams v. TartarCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.