Legal Opinion
Davey Pegging Mach. Co. v. Isaac Prouty & Co.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided February 9, 1901No. 316PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts.
1Opinion of the Court
PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.
This appeal grows out of the alleged infringement of claims 1, 2, 3, and 10 of the patent issued to John F. Davey on February 25, 1896, No. 555,434. These claims are as follows:
“(1) A work support for pegging machines, comprising a horn tip provided with a supporting annulus, combined with a button having a shank contained within said annulus, and a supporting portion resting on.said annulus, said button being provided with external gear teeth in a portion of its surface in bearing engagement with said annulus, substantially as and for the purpose described.
“(2) The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Western Electric Co. v. LaRueSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- United States v. Berdan Fire-Arms Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Watson v. StevensCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1892
- Norton v. JensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1892
- Consolidated Car Heating Co. v. American Electric Heating Corp.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Stanley Instrument Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1904
- Forsyth v. GarlockCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1905
- Blake & Knowles Steam Pump Works v. Warren Steam Pump Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1907
- Union Special Machine Co. v. Metropolitan Sewing Machine Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1912
- Weld Mfg. Co. v. Johnson Service Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1906